By Brian J. Lamoureux

October 25, 2022

Apple recently released iOS16 for the iPhone. This newest release allows iPhone users running iOS16 to edit and unsend text messages sent between other iOS16 users. While this may be welcome news for those of us who make embarrassing typos or otherwise hit the send button prematurely, it opens the door for some potential legal risks and issues that can arise.

The new features are fairly straightforward. Users can edit a text message up to five times within 15 minutes of sending it. The recipient will receive a notification that a message was edited and can also see a history of how the message was edited. As for the unsending feature, users will have only two minutes to unsend a message, and the recipient will be able to see that the message was unsent (but will not be able to recover or see it once it has been unsent).

It is too early to tell how these features will impact businesses and how their employees communicate, but one can foresee a host of potential issues that could arise. First, the unsend feature could make the investigation of sexual harassment or cyberstalking more challenging. Rather than a clear history of conversations between harasser and victim that an employer or police could review, there will now be a muddled travel of messages that could make it more difficult to get to the bottom of a harassment or cyberstalking claim. The feature may also embolden harassers into sending offensive messages and then unsending them in an effort to cover their tracks.

Another concerning issue relates to certain businesses and government agencies who are required by law or regulation, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission or under a state’s public records law, to maintain records. If employees use iOS16 and unsend business-related text messages, there is a substantial open question of whether that would constitute a “deleted” communication in violation of applicable laws or regulations that require communications to be preserved for a specific period of time.

These are just a couple of potential risks that this new iOS16 feature poses to employers. It has long been considered a best practice that text messaging in the workplace be used sparingly and for only non-substantive communications such as logistics or scheduling. Employers should also start giving some thought to how they might address or regulate employees’ use of this new unsending and editing feature while conducting official company business. It would be wise to consider reinforcing or adopting policies that prohibit employees from using text messaging to conduct substantive business and to require that email be used instead.

If you have questions or would like further information, please contact PLDO Partner Brian J. Lamoureux at 401-824-5155 or email Attorney Lamoureux is a member of the firm’s litigation, employment, and cybersecurity teams.

Disclaimer: This blog post is for informational purposes only. This blog is not legal advice and you should not use or rely on it as such. By reading this blog or our website, no attorney-client relationship is created. We do not provide legal advice to anyone except clients of the firm who have formally engaged us in writing to do so. This blog post may be considered attorney advertising in certain jurisdictions. The jurisdictions in which we practice license lawyers in the general practice of law, but do not license or certify any lawyer as an expert or specialist in any field of practice.

Recent Posts


It’s never a good idea to buy an asset, like a boat or plane, in your own name or to have multiple parties on the title. First of all, when your name is on the title, you are personally liable for any damage that the asset may cause. For example, you and Joe own a...


Before base jumping into the miasma of risk, the first thing you should do is make sure your estate plan, in its current iteration, meets your needs and has adapted to any challenging or changing family situation. A well-rounded estate plan is literally more of a life...


One never knows what corner the grim reaper lies behind. A final illness can often accelerate quickly and deprive a donor of adequate time to complete gifts for tax purposes that he intended to make. In a recent federal court case, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals...