THE SAME-PROTECTED-CLASS INFERENCE: COMPLAINTS OF DISCRIMINATION IN THE WORKPLACE

By Kathryn M. Couture

September 18, 2023

Diversity, equity, and inclusion is an integral part of today’s work environment. Many clients have inquired into whether an employee in a particular protected class could discriminate against another employee in that same protected class. The answer to that question—which may come as a surprise to some—is yes. Put simply, there is no “same protected class” super defense to a discrimination claim.

After being terminated from her employment, the plaintiff in Ilana Gamza-Machado de Souza v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. filed suit against her former employer and supervisors, alleging in part that she was discriminated against on the basis of her race and religion. In their motion for summary judgment, the defendants argued that one of the supervisors could not have acted discriminatorily towards the plaintiff because both the plaintiff and the supervisor belonged to the same protected classes.

In its decision, the Court stated that, while it could have drawn an inference that the plaintiff was not discriminated against because the alleged bad actor was in the same protected classes as the plaintiff, that presumption would not be conclusive. According to the Court, because the alleged bad actor made a discriminatory remark about a different employee in her same protected classes, and because the supervisor participated in the decision to terminate the plaintiff’s employment along with other management-level employees, a reasonable jury could find that the supervisor decided to terminate the plaintiff’s employment in part due to her race and religion, even though the supervisor belonged to the same race and religion.

Employers must take all reports of discrimination in the workplace seriously, ensuring they are not dismissive of an employee’s complaint simply because of a commonality in protected classes among the employee and the alleged bad actor. Protected classes under Rhode Island law include race or color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, disability, age, or country of ancestral origin.

For more information on how to adequately address complaints of discrimination in the workplace, or if you have any questions, please contact PLDO Attorney Kathryn M. Couture at 401-824-5100 or kcouture@pldolaw.com.

Recent Posts

HOW TO BUY ULTRA-DANGEROUS ASSETS

It’s never a good idea to buy an asset, like a boat or plane, in your own name or to have multiple parties on the title. First of all, when your name is on the title, you are personally liable for any damage that the asset may cause. For example, you and Joe own a...

SO, YOU WANT TO WRESTLE AN ALLIGATOR?

Before base jumping into the miasma of risk, the first thing you should do is make sure your estate plan, in its current iteration, meets your needs and has adapted to any challenging or changing family situation. A well-rounded estate plan is literally more of a life...

HASTE MAKES WASTE . . . CASH THE CHECK.

One never knows what corner the grim reaper lies behind. A final illness can often accelerate quickly and deprive a donor of adequate time to complete gifts for tax purposes that he intended to make. In a recent federal court case, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals...